Paper or plastic?
For single-serve milk market, there is no debate as
plastic sales soar, bringing smiles at dairy conclave
By Dan Campbell, editor
onald McDonald wasn’t
officially registered as a
guest or a speaker, but
his presence was certainly
felt during the joint
annual meeting of the National Milk
Producers Federation (NMPF) and
Dairy Management Inc. (DMI), the
planning and management organization
formed by the National Dairy
Promotion and Research Board
(NDB) and United Dairy Industry
Association (UDIA). The meeting,
held in Reno, Nev., was filled with
good news for dairy producers and
their co-ops. Some of the best reports
concerned the rapidly increasing sales
of single-serve milk containers at two
of the nation’s largest fast food
restaurant chains: McDonalds and
Wendy’s.
Wendy’s led the way by offering
single-serve milk in plastic bottles as a
substitute for soda in its kid-meal
packs. Within a year of introducing
the new milk packaging, sales shot up
from about 65,000 milk cartons to
more than 1 million plastic bottles of
milk per week, according to DMI
CEO Thomas Gallagher. McDonalds
soon followed suite, and saw its milk
sales rocket from 600,000 cartons to
4.2 million bottles weekly.
Other fast food chains are expected
to join the party as production
capacity is ramped up to meet the
surge in demand, producers were told
at the meeting, held in late October.
Many reasons to cheer
There were plenty of other reasons
for good cheer at the conference,
including big wins on the legislative
front, higher on-farm
milk prices thanks to
the industry’s supplybalancing
actions, and
an increasing number
of school districts getting
back on the milk
bandwagon.
Another cause for
optimism was the way
the entire industry —
producers and their
co-ops, food processors, retailers and
nutrition and health experts — are
uniting behind the “3-A-Day” promotional
campaign. That effort builds on
the newest version of the USDA food
pyramid, which has bumped up the
number of recommended daily servings
of dairy products from
two to three per day. New
dietary studies are also
showing that milk can play a
part in fighting the obesity
epidemic.
The 3-A-Day campaign
shows that producers can
look at food manufacturers
“not as the enemy, but as
powerful partners,”
Gallagher said. And to those
who think food pyramid
placement doesn’t mean much, he
pointed out that it helps to trigger
government food purchases for use in
feeding programs and the menu choices
made by school districts and health
professionals. Last year alone, school
lunch and Women, Infants and
Children (WIC) feeding programs
made about $16 billion in purchases.
DMI Chairman Paul Rovey said the
industry has traditionally been slow to
respond to changes in the fluid milk
market and has not been active enough
in meeting the challenge as “others
hedged-in on dairy’s calcium advantage.”
But the dairy industry has
become more flexible and proactive, as
the marketing gains of the past year
show, said Rovey, an Arizona dairyman.
Now the industry needs to capitalize
on the finding that dairy calcium is
a useful tool in fighting obesity, which
may prove to be “the most powerful
dairy nutrition message ever,” Rovey
said.
“Five years ago, we saw that obesity
would be ballooning as a health issue,
and we wanted to make sure dairy was
part of the solution, not the problem,”
Gallagher said.
The point hammered home
throughout the conference was that
most of these marketing successes can
be traced back to work funded by the
Dairy Checkoff program, under which
producers pay 15 cents per hundredweight
to fund promotion and
research.
CWT helps balance supply
Under the NMPF banner, dairy
producers helped to boost on-farm
milk prices this past year by using the
CWT program to better balance milk
supply with demand. CWT is an industry-
funded, self-help program under
which some producers contribute to a
special fund that helps reduce excess
milk production capacity by paying
some producers to retire from the
industry and by providing export assistance
for selected dairy products.
“To some, CWT was a crazy, betthe-
farm wager,” said Jerry Kozak,
NMPF president and CEO. “But others
were confident that it was a sound
investment for the dairy industry, and
they were proved right.” Indeed, the
program was renewed on July 1 for
another year.
“After 18 months of depressed milk
prices, doing nothing was the riskiest
course of all,” Kozak said. No one is
claiming CWT was entirely responsible
for higher on-farm milk prices last
year, but it was definitely a “tailwind”
that can probably take credit for a
price increase of 60 cents per hundredweight,
he noted.
“CWT needs to be part of the
industry’s long-term portfolio,” Kozak
stressed.
There were also key successes on
the legislative front, including a fullcourt-
press lobbying effort that resulted
in no major increase in dairy product
imports from “down under” as a
result of the Australia Free Trade
Agreement. NMPF Chairman Charles
Beckendorf said that trade deal would
have been “anything but free for our
dairy producers.”
NMPF staff and co-op representatives
spent “countless hours” knocking
on doors on Capitol Hill to carry the
dairy producer’s message to Congress
and the Bush administration. They
even bought a full-page ad in the
Washington Times to run an open letter
to President Bush, telling him how
crucial trade and other legislative
issues are to dairy producers.
Beckendorf said that there will still
likely be a slight rise in dairy imports
into the United States in coming years,
but that it will be “a drop in the bucket
compared to what it could have been.”
Politics and government policy will
always be a big part of the dairy industry,
Kozak said, quoting Charles
DeGaulle’s comment that “politics is
too serious to leave to politicians.”
Campaign finance reform has not
removed the need for political action
committees, he added. “Federal officials
want to know what people are
thinking, and you must stand out from
the crowd to be counted.”
Working in partnership with IDFA
(International Dairy Foods Assoc., a
food processors’ trade group) was “a
risky gamble,” given that the organization
“has so often been at odds with
us,” Kozak said. But successes in
school lunch lobbying and other areas
has proven it to be a good business
move, he added.
School sales gaining
The dairy industry successfully supported
legislation passed by Congress
earlier this year that requires school
districts to offer students at least two
types of milk and would forbid schools
from entering into exclusive contracts
with soft drink companies that restrict
the sale of milk products at school
functions.
Beckendorf said the industry’s ability
to work with schools is vital, because
improved milk products must be
placed in front of the nation’s youth at
a time when they are forming lifelong
dietary habits. As one speaker said, “if
they drink milk at 16, odds are they
will still be drinking it at 86.”
Test marketing showed that inschool
milk sales would jump 30 percent
when the switch was made to resealable
plastic bottles. But last year’s
results were even better, up 34 percent
in schools where the change was made,
Gallagher said. And this year the number
of schools offering the improved
packaging will jump from 1,200 to
3,000, meaning the industry needs
“more processors to step forward” with
the product, he added.
Mad Cow response
The discovery of mad cow disease
(BSE) in a single animal in Moses Lake,
Wash., in December 2003 could have
been a disaster for the dairy industry,
but a crisis communications plan was in
place for that eventuality, leading to the
flow of the type of prompt, reliable
information needed to reassure the
public and media about the safety of the
nation’s dairy foods and herds.
Beckendorf said the biggest outcome
of the BSE discovery will be the
eventual creation of a national animal
identification program that will enable
any disease problem to be traced back
to the exact source so that it can be
nipped in the bud.
With a lean staff of only 17,
Beckendorf said he knows of no other
ag commodity organization that does as
much for its members at does NMPF.
New direction for promotion
William Siebenborn, a Missouri
dairyman and UDIA chairman, said
forging a single dairy marketing plan
and vision will help boost worldwide
demand for U.S. dairy products. Under
this effort, what had been primarily an
advertising and classroom-based dairy
promotional program has transitioned
to one that leverages partnerships with
the industry. It was not a quick or easy
transformation to complete, he said,
adding that the effort starts with local
dairy promotion boards.
“Kids don’t read or study the food
pyramid,” he said, so product presenta-
tion to them is all important. “Milk
won’t be cool just by saying it is in
ads,” he continued. “We need the right
products in the right places — availability
is the key.” So emphasis has
switched from running health-oriented
ads to creating milk products with
more pizzazz.
“Now the concept is to work within
marketing chains to get improved
products into more outlets,” Gallagher
said. He cited Yoplait Yogurt as an
example, noting that it will print the
3-A-Day logo on all of its yogurt lids.
“That’s 2 billion packages annually that
moms all across the country will be
seeing,” he said.
William Ahlem, Jr., a Hilmar, Calif.,
dairyman and NDB chairman, said it
takes an enormous logistical effort to
get new dairy products into stores and
fast food restaurants. The industry has
felt “tremendous frustration” for many
years with school districts for not being
more willing to include more milk and
dairy products on their menus.
A door of opportunity was thrown
open to the dairy industry when the
Surgeon General issued a warning that
the nation is facing a calcium-deficiency
crisis, Ahlem continued. The report
said 7 of 10 boys and 9 of 10 girls are
deficient in calcium. Other reports
indicate that the nation’s epidemic of
obesity is increasingly spreading to our
children. Dairy Checkoff-funded
research shows that calcium helps burn
body fat, Ahlem noted.
Low-carb milk?
About 7 percent of the U.S. population
is now on a low-carb diet, and 24
percent say they are watching their
carbs, it was noted.
John Kaneb, CEO and chairman of
HP Hood, a New England dairy company
with seven national dairy brands
and $2.3 billion in annual sales, said
Hood spent $25 million in 2004 to
develop a new low-carb milk, called
Carb Countdown. That effort was
launched following a request from
Wal-Mart in 2003 for such a product.
Kaneb, whose family purchased Hood
in 1995, said even a company of
Hood’s size can’t go on putting that
kind of money into new product development
indefinitely.
Hood would like to find ways it can
work with dairy co-ops and NMPF to
get more help in the early stages of
product development, he said. “Dairy’s
competitors have many advantages.
They either control raw materials, or
the raw materials are so cheap — as in
the case of soda — that they don’t
need to control them,” he said.
Kaneb indicated that help from
dairy producers might come in the
form of allowing processors to avoid
having to pay Class I prices for milk
being purchased for use in some of
these promising new products.
Hood also makes Lactaid, a bestselling,
lactose-free milk. It too is
expensive to process and package, as it
must be processed with enzymes.
Hood has to buy five gallons of milk to
make four gallons of Lactaid, Kaneb
said, “so producers should love it.”
Other meeting highlights:
- U.S. Agriculture Trade Ambassador
Allen Johnson said the goal in ongoing
trade talks is to establish the level
playing field that farmers demand.
He said President Bush has made ag
trade a priority, and that “without
agriculture, there is no trade agenda.”
He urged farmers to continue to
make their voices heard, noting that
their coffee shop discussions funnel
up to farm and co-op meetings that
eventually help set trade policy. He
noted that the EU and some other
competitors far out-spend the
United States on export subsidies
and trade-distorting domestic supports,
and they erect far more tariff
and non-tariff barriers.
- Emphasis is being placed on development
of new cheese snacks, which
is important because a slowdown is
expected in the growth in demand
for cheese from pizza makers.
- Almost all consumption gains in the
beverage category are being achieved
by health beverages, led by bottled
water, which has doubled its sales
since 1998. Low-carb drinks are up
67 percent, while milk is up only
about 1 percent since 1998. Drinkable
yogurts have been a bright spot
for dairy, with sales quadrupling
since 1999.
- Soy beverages “tried to grab a bigger
piece of the action” from real milk in
2004, which the dairy industry is
countering with efforts to keep the soy
drinks from being labeled as “milk.”
- Some soda-pop companies, including
Coke and Schweppes, are experimenting
with dairy soft drinks containing
about half milk. This is
largely seen as negative for dairy
producers, in that these drinks
would be marketed as a milk
replacement (and would thus cannibalize
existing milk sales). On the
plus side, these companies have the
ability to get the drinks into convenience
stores and vending machines,
where dairy struggles for a bigger
presence. One speaker said soft
drink companies may have designed
these products simply as “place
holders” to fulfill school contracts
requiring that dairy beverages be
offered to students. Both companies
have currently pulled their dairy soft
drinks off the market, but others are
likely coming.
- Kevin Toland, executive director with
Irish dairy co-op Glanbia PLC,
reported on a major new cheese plant
being built in New Mexico as a joint
venture with DFA. The new factory
will be one of the largest and most
- efficient cheese plants in the world,
processing over 2.4 billion pounds of
milk and producing in excess of 250
million pounds of cheese and 16.5
million pounds of high-value-added
whey proteins annually. Variety, convenience
and healthful nutrition factors
are driving consumer choices, he
said, calling nutrition a “worldwide
mega-trend.” While dairy foods are
very nutritious, they are being “outmarketed
and out-scienced by the
competition,” he said. “Even on calcium,
we are being beaten by rawcalcium
supplements.” He said using
more dairy products, such as whey, as
food ingredients and nutritional supplements,
looks very promising, and
he gave a detailed overview of the
potential market.
CoBank CEO: Gear co-ops to consumer demand
Doug Sims, CEO of Denver-based CoBank, told national
dairy conference attendees that consumer-driven co-ops
will be the winners in the years ahead because “the consumer
is driving the bus that all of agriculture is riding on.”
For many, the ability to capitalize on market niches will also
be crucial as is their capability to work together to strengthen
the market position of co-ops. Co-ops must further show
how they are different and what makes them unique — to
demonstrate that they add value for members, customers
and employees, said
Sims, who grew up
on a dairy farm.
CoBank and its
affiliated agricultural
credit associations in
the U.S. Farm Credit
System support the
dairy industry with
more than $2 billion in
loans outstanding to
agricultural cooperatives,
dairy processors
and dairy farm
operators.
Sims told attendees
at the annual
meeting of the National Milk Producers Federation, United
Dairy Association and National Dairy Promotion and
Research Board that the dairy industry today has “more
influence than any other livestock industry because you are
working together.” For example, Sims pointed to the milk
supply/demand balancing program of Cooperatives Working
Together (CWT) as “a real success that shows the industry
is united.”
He encouraged continued cooperation, noting that coops
need to collaborate to fund research and development
— as the dairy industry is — and should even try working
with competitors.
At a time when only a handful
of retail chains control
approximately 40 percent of
food sales in the U.S., Sims said
through cooperation, co-ops
can and must create market
power. The rate of concentration
in food retail markets is
likely to accelerate rapidly, he
predicted, and co-ops must
establish market position with
these top food retailers.
“Investing in new ways to
collaborate, investing in new
products, new markets and
new ways of thinking about
your value proposition are critical
success factors,” Sims said.
Sims added that the dairy industry’s willingness to fund
new, innovative products is paying off. He pointed to the
industry’s success in introducing “low-carb” products to
satisfy changing consumer preferences as one example.
Citing research from Productscan Online, Sims noted that in
the first five months of the past year, dairy processors introduced
62 “low-carb” ice creams. In contrast, there were
only 19 “low-carb” ice creams in 2003 and in 2000 there
were none.
“Consumer-driven co-ops will be the global winners,” he
said. “The consumer by far is the key driver in the food system.
In the U.S., the consumer is “king and queen.”
Sims also acknowledged the changing global marketplace,
noting that governments are reducing barriers to
entry and providing access to U.S. markets. Specifically
with regard to the Farm Credit System, Sims said that FCS
owes thanks to the dairy industry for supporting efforts to
oppose the sale of a key Farm Credit System lender to Dutch
banking giant Rabobank this past year. He stressed the
importance of farmers having a locally owned and controlled
cooperative lender.
Another key factor to watch in today’s business environment,
according to Sims, is the effect of recent scandals on
the image of corporate America. Good governance practices
by co-ops will help avoid such scandals, he advised. He
posed a series of questions to encourage co-op attendees to
engage in critical self-examination of their business practices,
governance policies and business focus. “What do you
offer members that they value? Why should retailers take
your products? Why do employees want to work for you?
What is the difference between your co-op and the business
down the road? What training do you provide your directors?
If patronage returns are the only way a co-op returns
value to members, it will ultimately prove to be a losing
proposition, Sims continued. Co-ops must also deliver superior
service and convenience, and provide access to domestic
and global markets at a competitive price.
He further urged co-op leaders at the meeting to determine
whether their capital plan will meet demands of equity
retirements, business growth, product research and development
and other needs. If outside capital is being raised,
how will it affect the governance of the co-op? “And does
your co-op have the right skills on the board? Do directors
understand the co-op’s strategic plan? How is the co-op
measuring progress?”
If directors lack skills, get training for them, he stressed,
and remember that every meeting is a director-training
opportunity. Sims said he is a proponent for using outside
(non-member) directors to bring valuable expertise to the
board, which can range from help with product development
to greater financial acumen.
The most important function of a co-op board is hiring the
CEO or manager, Sims continued. To do it right, and to monitor
his or her performance, directors must be able to ask the
right questions.
“The keys to success today and in the future is all about
investing in the right things — people, strategy and business
execution,” he emphasized. “Co-ops need to critically
examine the combination of expertise reflected in their
boards and management teams, re-evaluate their business
focus in light of changing markets and challenges, and collaborate
in efforts to deliver innovative products quickly and
efficiently.
“Working together, co-ops can invest in a better future,
and continue to make a definitive difference in the marketplace,”
he concluded.
By Dan Campbell
Livingston gives producers legislative tips
Former Louisiana Rep. Bob Livingston, who chaired the
House Appropriations Committee during his tenure, told
producers they must continue to find effective ways to
make their needs known to their elected officials. “You may
be convinced in the righteousness of your position, but
there is always someone just as fervent on the other side,”
said Livingston, who retired from Congress in 1999 and now
operates a lobbying firm.
“You need to frame and condense your message so that
they listen to you, rather than the other guy. That’s why we
band together in trade
associations and hire
lobbyists and attorneys
— to study, advocate
and lobby.”
Congressional representatives
are incredibly
busy, he said, so you
can’t waste their time.
“You must be ready to
make your case in 15 to
30 minutes.” He advised
letting elected officials
know that a large number
of their constituents
favor the position you
espouse, and hammer that point home by having constituents
contact the official prior to, or immediately following,
your meeting. “It is incredibly important to have grassroots
activity back home support your position,” Livingston
said.
He advised producer groups to find out when one of their
elected officials will be back home, and then volunteer to
host a fact-finding session for them. These can take the form
of a town hall-type meeting with constituents, a tour of farms,
etc. Having your political action committee hold a fund-raising
barbecue on a member’s farm is also a good idea. Such
an event can be 90 percent fun, but the critical time “is the
half-hour you spend discussing your key concern.”
Members can also become activists in campaigns, he
noted.
“Tighter budget caps are coming for farm programs,
which means you must make your voice even louder,”
Livingston said.
He noted that the dairy
industry failed last year to
close a loophole that is allowing
imported casein-protein
to enter the United States,
which means the industry
needs to worker harder next
year to close the loophole.
“Continue to work to make
sure free trade means fair
trade, and work to hold your
seat at the table so you don’t
wind up as the main course,”
Livingston advised. “Oppose
unilateral disarmament [in
trade talks]. Keep pressure on your elected officials all
year long.”
Congressional oversight of agriculture is critical, but
over-regulation is not, he said. “If government does not
provide sufficient oversight, you get monopolies and lack of
competition.” But too much regulation will stifle the industries
it is supposed to help.”