LEGAL CORNER
New tax law includes several
cooperative provisions
By Donald A. Frederick,
Program Leader for Law,
Policy & Governance
USDA Rural Development/RBS
e-mail: donald.frederick@usda.gov
Editor’s note: this article does not represent
official policy of USDA, the Internal
Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of
the Treasury or any other government
agency. It is presented only to provide
information to persons interested in the tax
treatment of cooperatives.
n Oct. 22, President
Bush signed into law the
American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004. The primary
impetus for the new
law was a World Trade Organization
(WTO) ruling that certain export tax
benefits in our existing tax code violated
international trade agreements we
had signed. The WTO authorized
European countries to collect special
tariffs on American products they
imported, until we repealed those
export tax benefits.
While the original purpose of the
legislation was to repeal the export
incentives in question, numerous other
changes to the tax code were added
during the legislative process. The end
result is a long, complex statute that
includes several provisions important
to cooperatives.
Extraterritorial Income
Exclusion repeal
The offending export incentive,
called the extraterritorial income (ETI)
exclusion, is repealed for transactions
after Dec. 31, 2004. This includes the
language allowing agricultural and
horticultural marketing cooperatives to
pass ETI benefits through to their
patrons. Transition rules provide cooperatives
and other taxpayers with 80
percent of their otherwise-available
ETI benefits for transactions during
2005 and 60 percent of their otherwise-
available ETI benefits for transactions
during 2006.
Transition relief is also available for
income realized under certain contracts
in effect on September 17, 2003.
U.S. Production Deduction enacted
To encourage United States domestic
economic growth, the law provides
a new, phased-in deduction from taxable
income for a portion of “qualified
production activities income” (QPAI)
generated by businesses, including
cooperatives. The new deduction can
be as much as 3 percent of QPAI for
tax years beginning in 2005-2006, 6
percent for 2007-2009, and 9 percent
for 2010 and later.
The range of income that can qualify
is broad, including most taxable
income realized on manufacturing,
producing, growing and extracting
goods in the United States. Special
rules of interest to cooperatives provide
that:
Income from food processing (but
not retail operations) is included,
Income from storing and handling
(but not transporting) agricultural
products that are used in manufacturing,
producing or growing other
goods is included, and
Income from the production (but not
the transmission or distribution) of
electricity, natural gas and potable
water is included.
Two limitations apply to this deduction.
First, the deduction that may be
claimed is the lesser of QPAI or taxable
income for the year. So, if a cooperative
or other taxpayer loses money
on other activities, that could reduce
or eliminate this deduction. A special
provision in the law says cooperatives
that allocate the deduction to their patrons
can compute “taxable income” for this
purpose without taking into account
their deductions for qualified patronage
refund and per-unit retain allocations
and the redemption of non-qualifieds.
The allocation rules are discussed
later in this article.
Second, the QPAI deduction may
not exceed 50 percent of the W-2
wages paid by the taxpayer for the year.
Cooperative Pass-through Provision
The report of the conferees who
drafted the final version of the law
makes it clear that income derived
from manufacturing, production,
growth or extraction of any agricultural
or horticultural product by a cooperative,
or from marketing agricultural
or horticultural products by a cooperative,
may be included in the cooperative’s
QPAI. A note to that report
states that the term “agricultural or
horticultural product” includes “fertilizer,
diesel fuel and other supplies used
in agricultural or horticultural production
that are manufactured, produced,
grown or extracted by the cooperative.”
The law provides that patrons of
agricultural and horticultural cooperatives
can take a deduction on their tax
returns for QPAI allocated to them as
part of a qualified patronage refund or
qualified per-unit retain. The amount
each patron can deduct must be computed
by the cooperative and a written
notice must be provided each patron
explaining the computation.
A special rule says a cooperative may
not take a patronage refund deduction
for amounts passed through to patrons
that can be deducted by those patrons.
As this amount is already eligible for
the QPAI deduction at the cooperative
level, this language merely makes it
clear cooperatives can’t deduct the
same amount twice.
Example case
This example illustrates how the
deduction and the pass-through might
work at a typical agricultural or horticultural
cooperative. Assume Co-op C
has $100,000 of QPAI. Also assume it
is a tax year beginning in 2005 or
2006, so the available deduction is 3
percent of QPAI, or $3,000.
Co-op C allocates the $100,000 to
its member-patrons as a qualified
patronage refund. It is allowed to
deduct the $3,000 in QPAI under the
new law and the remaining $97,000 as
a traditional patronage refund. Thus,
the result is the same for the cooperative
as it was before the new law was
enacted, the entire $100,000 is
deductible.
Now, assume Patron P does 10 percent
of the business with Co-op C in
the tax year. Patron P receives a
patronage refund of $10,000 in QPAI,
all of which is taxable income to Patron
P. However, under the new law Patron
P can deduct the applicable percentage
of QPAI (3 percent in 2005 and 2006),
or $300. The value of this benefit will
increase significantly when the QPAI
deduction increases to 6 percent in
2007 and again to 9 percent in 2010.
Another provision states that any
qualifying activity of patrons who market
agricultural or horticultural marketing
through a cooperative may be
attributed to that cooperative for purposes
of computing its QPAI deduction.
Planning suggestions
Here are some points to remember
in planning how best to use this new
deduction. First, the legislative language
is not always entirely clear. Tax
experts have many unanswered questions
about determining what income
is eligible for the deduction. So, all
cooperatives will want to work with
their tax adviser to keep abreast of
Internal Revenue Service rulings and
other interpretations of this program.
Second, the deduction is first available
for tax years beginning on, or
after, Jan. 1, 2005. Many cooperatives
on a tax year that begins sometime in
the summer or fall will thus have nearly
two years to become familiar with
the intricacies of computing and allocating
it.
Third, it is a deduction, not a credit.
Tax credits, such as the energyrelated
credits discussed later in this
article, can be used dollar-for-dollar to
offset taxes due. Deductions can only
be used to reduce taxable income, so
their value depends on each taxpayer’s
tax bracket.
Dividend Allocation Rule repeal
The dividend allocation rule was an
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) interpretation
of the tax code requiring
cooperatives that paid dividends on
their equity investments to allocate
those dividends on a pro rata basis
between their patronage and nonpatronage
income. Under the new law,
cooperatives can pay dividends on
stock entirely out of non-patronage
income. This allows cooperatives to
reduce the tax cost of paying dividends
on their equity investments and, at the
same time, return more of their margins
to patrons as patronage refunds.
To take advantage of this change,
the new law requires cooperatives to
have appropriate language authorizing
them to pay stock dividends out of
non-patronage income in their articles
of incorporation, bylaws or marketing
contracts with their members and
other patrons. Many cooperatives will
want to amend one or more of these
organizational documents to include
such a provision.
Declaratory Judgment relief
Farmer cooperatives that want
access to the special tax deductions
permitted under Internal Revenue
Code section 521 and other benefits
that come with section 521 status,
must apply for, and receive, approval
from IRS. In the past, the only ways a
cooperative could get a court to review
a rejection of its application was claim
a deduction IRS said they weren’t entitled
to, or pay some tax they didn’t
think they owed and then sue for a
refund. This provision enables a
farmer cooperative to seek judicial
review of the denial without first creating
a tax controversy or being subject
to immediate tax liability.
Marketing includes value-added
processing involving animals
One of the activities that allows a
farmer cooperative to qualify for section
521 tax status is to engage in
“...marketing the products of members
or other producers.” IRS interpreted
this language to include value-added
processing involving a mechanical
process (converting corn to ethanol)
but not a biological process (feeding
corn to hens and selling eggs and
chickens).
The new law makes it clear that
under both section 521 and regular
cooperative tax rules, marketing products
of members and other producers
includes feeding products of members
and other producer to cattle, hogs,
fish, chickens or other animals and
selling the resulting animals or animal
products.
Small ethanol producer
credit, co-op pass-through
Current law provides a 10-centsper-
gallon tax credit for each gallon of
ethanol produced and sold by so-called
small ethanol producers, including
cooperatives. These are companies
with production capacity that does not
exceed 30 million gallons of ethanol
per year. The credit can be claimed on
production of up to 15 million gallons
of ethanol per year.
The new law allows cooperatives to
choose to pass some or all of the small
ethanol producer credit through to
their patrons. The credit is to be apportioned
among patrons on the basis of
the quantity or value of business done
with, or for, such patrons during the tax
year. Any credit not passed through to
patrons is treated as a general business
credit by the cooperative.
Small, low-sulfur diesel fuel
producer credit, co-op pass-through
The act creates a new, 5-cents-pergallon
tax credit to small petroleum
refiners who must incur capital costs
complying with the Environmental
Protection Agency’s rules limiting the
sulfur content of diesel fuel. Eligible
refiners may claim the credit until
they have recovered 25 percent of
such costs. For these purposes, a
small refiner is one that employs not
more than 1,500 persons directly in
refining and has less than 205,000
barrels per day (average) of total
refining capacity. The credit is
reduced for refiners with a capacity
between 155,000 and 205,000 barrels
per day. The conferees’ report states
that when capacity “differs substantially”
from average daily output of
refined product, capacity should be
measured by reference to average
daily output.
Cooperatives may also choose to
pass some or all of this credit through
to their patrons. As with the small
ethanol producer credit, any passthrough
is to be apportioned among
patrons on the basis of patronage and
any credit not passed through to
patrons is treated as a general business
credit by the cooperative.