PAGE FROM THE PAST


From the archives of Rural Cooperatives
and its predecessor magazines


50 Years Ago...
From the January & February 1957 issues of News for Cooperatives
Citrus co-ops help growers share export bonus
Florida citrus growers earned $12.2 million from citrus exports in the 1955-56 season. Growers realized that amount over and above what they would have received had there been no active export program.

According to Martin Hearn, export coordinator of Florida Citrus Mutual, “Every million boxes of Florida oranges shipped overseas, either in fresh or processed form, results in an increase of 5 cents per box on the entire remaining production consumed domestically. On grapefruit, when production is within tolerable limits, this figure is 13 cents per box.” Or, as Hearn indicates, growers’ returns for oranges are 3 percent higher at the ontree level for each 1 percent of the total Florida crop exported.

This program should interest cooperators, not only in Florida, but in other areas as well, for it offers a modern-day lesson that clearly demonstrates the value of cooperative organization.

Florida Citrus Mutual put on a campaign in the fall of 1955 to acquaint sales personnel with the preferences and requirements of the European market, which included a 10-day tour of those markets by mostly cooperative shippers. On the heels of this trip came the realization that Spanish citrus exports for that season and for seasons to come would be severely curtailed due to an unusually bad freeze. Interest in the export market took on a new look. As a result of this emphasis on exports, Florida’s 1955-56 fresh overseas export volume showed an increase of nearly 461,000 boxes, or 41 percent, over the previous seasons. The state’s two largest citrus marketing cooperatives accounted for almost nine-tenths of the increase last season.

Locker plants: new merchandising mechanism
Frozen-food locker plants can help farmers process and sell locally some of what they produce. These plants also help farmers consume a portion of their own food.

Community frozen-food locker plants—plus their “sidekick,” the home freezer—offer farmers a unique, built-toorder mechanism for improving local processing and merchandising. Since most plants are located near the source of livestock, poultry and other perishable foods, they can process and merchandise foods in wholesale quantities direct to locker and home freezer patrons, as well as to retail outlets, institutions and others in localized areas.

Such a system of marketing cuts labor, transportation and handling costs, bypasses or eliminates some steps in the marketing process and converts the farmer’s raw product into a form of commercial product suitable for consumer use. Because of these plants’ direct contact with consumers, they can ascertain consumers’ preferences and more quickly reflect them back to producers, as well as narrow the spread between producers and consumers.

30 Years Ago...
From the January and February 1977 issues of Farmer
Cooperatives


Farmer co-ops show
innovation with special services

Agricultural cooperatives provide a variety of special or unusual services to meet the needs of their farmer members, according to a new study compiled by John M. Bailey, senior agricultural economist with USDA’s Farmer Cooperative Service. Crop production aids offered by cooperatives include machinery rental, bulk handling of seed, crop monitoring, pest management, yield improvements and citrus grove care.

Livestock production services include fence construction, cattle feeding, and determination of total-dairyration profiles, establishing new turkey growers in a risk-sharing program, and maintaining a truck route for dairy supplies.

Among marketing services are selling potatoes in the futures market, assembling black walnuts for sale, and freezing fish for price stabilization.

Management services include an advance deposit program that earns interest on the deposit, an economic feasibility study guide, and a farm consulting and tax service.

Individual co-op members are being offered health examinations, a credit card program, commercial painting service, mortuary service, and employee commuter vans.

NMPF meeting focuses on Capper-Volstead
Words of assurance about the Capper-Volstead Act and a challenge to preserve cooperatives and dairy marketing programs were heard at the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) annual convention, Nov. 28 to Dec. 1, 1976.

“There is no threat to the Capper-Volstead Act,” explains Congressman Thomas S. Foley, chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture. “The new administration has committed to protect the basic legislation and the needs of the agriculture movement. Congressional support is overwhelmingly strong and it must be continued.”

Foley also told the 2,500 dairy farmers and cooperative leaders assembled in San Francisco that it may be necessary to extend the current farm legislation one year to give the new administration more time to review current programs. He concluded by calling for federal disaster protection for farmers, some form of price support programs and increased agricultural research and education programs.

NMPF Secretary Patrick B. Healy warned that cooperatives, the market order program, the price support program and preservation of the domestic milk market must not be impaired legislatively. Continuing, Healy said extra care must be taken to make certain that “damage is not done to the complex of legislation that has made farming possible in today’s America.” Referring to these programs, Healy concluded, “Let the word go out from here and be heard by all those responsible—or who become responsible in areas of interest to dairy farmers—that there are certain things we hold to be inviolable.”

10 Years Ago...
From the November/December 1996 issue of Rural Cooperatives

Harvest States launches investment plan
With the disappearing safety net of government farm programs, producers and their cooperatives are looking to the marketplace to provide greater returns. Harvest States Cooperatives, which just reported record earnings of $57.9 million on total sales of $8.2 billion, has devised a strategy to accomplish that goal.

The Harvest States Investment Plan applies to the co-op’s strengths and established track record, adding the best of the new, definedmembership cooperative approach. The catalyst in the mix is a commitment to strive for the maximum return to members from value-added processing, marketing and services.

The plan gives producers and cooperatives an opportunity to increase returns from Harvest States food processing operations by investing in “equity participation units.” Investments would be available on a per-bushel basis. They would carry the right and obligation for the member-investor to deliver the number of bushels involved to an authorized delivery point, normally a nearby member cooperative or Harvest States facility. This provision is a key element in ensuring that the plan qualifies for cooperative status.

Co-op banks hold market share
A new Farm Credit Administration report notes that while the Farm Credit System (FCS) has lost market share since the mid-1980s, banks for cooperatives have maintained their historical average market share of about 60 percent. Banks for cooperatives’ portion of the FCS loan portfolio more than doubled, from 10.9 percent to 26 percent, during the same period.

The report traces changes since 1969 in rural and farm demographics, as well as the characteristics of farm finance and farm real estate, as well as modifications that have occurred in the financing of farmer cooperatives.





January/February Table of Contents