COMMENTARY

Put a soybean in your tank


It may not have quite the ring of the Put a Tiger in Your Tank advertising campaign from the 1960s, but for those of us paying well above $2 a gallon for gasoline this summer, the idea of putting corn kernels or soybeans in our fuel tanks may have some new-found appeal. As of this writing in early July, gas prices have subsided a bit, but with domestic and worldwide petroleum reserves ever dwindling, it seems we are climbing an increasingly steep petrolprice stairway-- one with no end.

While farmers are hit even harder than most Americans by higher fuel bills, at least some of them are smiling: those corn/soybean farmers who have built ethanol and soydiesel processing plants. They are currently earning good returns by transforming their crops into a value-added product that is simultaneously beginning to help ease our nation’s dependence on foreign oil.

We’ve devoted a large portion of this issue to relating the experiences of several of these new processing co-ops. Articles have also been contributed by some farm supply co-ops which are promoting the sale of ethanol or soydiesel. Farmer and utility cooperatives are also delving into production and use of other renewable fuels and energy sources, such as methane recovery, thermal depolymerization, wind and solar power and other technologies.

In addition to farmers earning money from biofuels, the increased demand they create for corn and soybeans has helped to raise grain prices for all farmers in their operating regions. Better still, some towns, such as Benson, Minn., credit an overall revival in their economies to the opening of ethanol processing plants in their vicinity. The co-op there, Chippewa Valley Ethanol, has also been a leader in promoting a marketing venture that is selling ethanol for a number of co-ops. Some observers say such marketing ventures are needed for producers to truly reap the benefits of a biofuel economy.

Just because things are going well now doesn’t mean they will continue to. For a cautionary tale, read the account in this issue of what happened to ethanol pioneer Minnesota Corn Processors. It’s a story others won’t want to repeat. MCP was once the nation’s leading producer of ethanol. Many factors contributed to its demise and the eventual decision to sell its operations. Author Anthony Crooks says a major reason was a desire/need by older members to sell out to ADM because they couldn’t find other producers to buy their co-op/LLC stock. That’s a problem many co-ops are wrestling with in one way or another.

Some Minnesota legislators-- who were strongly supportive of the coop and the $33 million in state subsidies it had received while farmer owned-- feel the taxpayers were cheated when the operation was sold. One legislator has even demanded that ADM return those taxpayer dollars. As well as the industry is doing at present, it obviously is still heavily dependent on such incentives, both to help build plants and to boost prices for ethanol and biodiesel. If producerowned co-ops and LLCs wind up being absorbed by industry giants, it could spell real trouble for the continuation of such incentives.

A board member of one ethanol co-op told us that farmers are very cognizant what happened to MCP and they don’t believe they will get caught in the same trap. If so, and if the technology and economics of biofuel production continue on anything like their current trajectory, the Corn Belt may someday also become the nation’s Fuel Belt --or at least its reserve tank.

Keeping the industry largely farmer owned, with the majority of the benefits distributed in rural areas that produce and process the grain, may be the best self-help rural development program to come down the pike in many years.

Dan Campbell, Editor





July/August Table of Contents