Unflappable
Plant closure forces Virginia poultry
cooperative launch onto fast-track
By Paul Darby, Southern States
Cooperative Development Foundation
Editor’s note: Bill Brockhouse, a co-op development specialist with
USDA Rural Development in Washington, D.C., also contributed
to this article.
etermination is “the act of deciding definitely
or firmly,” according to Webster’s Dictionary.
In the world of cooperative development,
determination can be defined as having “fire in
the belly.” The Shenandoah Valley-area poultry
growers who formed the Virginia Poultry Growers
Cooperative (VPGC) possess plenty of each attribute; otherwise,
they could never have launched their business under
such intense pressure and in such a time frame.
In the Harrisonburg, Va.-area, if you mention the names
of Sonny Meyerhoeffer Jr., the co-op’s first president, Steve
Long, its vice chairman, or those of a half-dozen other
turkey growers who helped lead the co-op’s organizational
drive, people will tell you these individuals refused to buckle
in the face of unbelievable obstacles and challenges. They
stood tall when the heat was on. As a result of their determination,
the co-op is now
processing and marketing
members’ birds at their own
business — one that embodies the
hope for the future of the Valley’s
poultry industry.
“I’ve rarely seen people so driven to succeed
in the face of adversity,” says Peter Thomas,
business and cooperative programs administrator
for USDA Rural Development. “I’m glad USDA
was able to lend its support to help keep this vital
industry alive in the Shenandoah Valley. This project
shows how much can be achieved when you
have a total commitment by producers and their
communities.”
Plant closure stuns Valley
This story begins when Pilgrim’s Pride — one of the
nation’s major poultry companies — announced that it was
exiting the Shenandoah Valley turkey industry and would be
closing its processing plant near Harrisonburg by Sept. 1,
2004. That news sent a shock wave throughout the Valley
and into neighboring West Virginia. The region was looking
at the loss of $200 million to the local
economy, the loss of 900 plant-related
jobs and more than 130 farmers would
not have a contract to grow turkeys.
These growers quickly came to grips
with the fact that they were likely to
lose their farms if they didn’t act
quickly.
Turkey producers (grow-out, breeders
and egg producers) almost immediately
hit on the idea of forming a
grower co-op that could take over the
processing plant operation in Hinton,
Va., as occurred in recent years in Iowa
and Michigan. They had an unwavering
faith (personal and professional)
that they could develop a successful
business, even though circumstances
made it impossible for them to follow
the standard cooperative development
format. What they didn’t have was
time, and they knew that a business
plan rushed has been the doom of
many an otherwise sound business.
But the producers believed from
Day One that they could, and would,
succeed in spite of the conventional
wisdom that says it takes 12-18 months
to plan, determine the feasibility and
develop a business plan for a new
value-added processing business. Due
to the short window of opportunity,
poultry growers had to move toward
implementation before completing
these steps.
The perennial problem of capitalization
of a value-added venture was
solved through a package of resources
that included producer capital, commercial
financing from the Farm
Credit System, funding from USDA
Rural Development and funding from
both Virginia and West Virginia state
governments.
All of this happened after the April
26, 2004, announcement by Pilgrim’s
Pride that it was closing its turkey-processing
plant at Hinton, Va., and canceling
grower contracts. Pilgrim’s
Pride said the closure was brought on
by major changes in the turkey industry
and by its desire to focus operations
on other plants that produced
value-added turkey products (such as
sliced deli meats), as opposed to the
bird parts produced in the Hinton
plant.
Not just Pilgrim’s Pride, but the
entire turkey industry is undergoing
major changes. Many major players are
changing their marketing strategies
and focus. While on-farm and wholesale
turkey prices have been above
average in the past six months, the
five-year average is far lower. Outbreaks
of avian influenza in early 2004
in the Valley and in the adjacent states
of Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey
and Pennsylvania, as well as in Texas,
hit the industry hard. But these facts
did not deter the producers.
The likely impact of all those lost
jobs, farms and related revenue soon
attracted the attention of local, state,
and federal government officials, who
began offering technical and financial
help.
How they did it
So how did the turkey producers
manage to make the transition from
contract growers to owners and operators
of a major turkey processing business
and feed mill in just 181 days?
Here are the major steps:
(All dates in 2004)
- May 21 — growers met and voiced
support to determine whether they
could buy the Pilgrim’s Pride plant
in Hinton.
- May 26 — growers file articles of
incorporation for the Virginia
Poultry Growers Cooperative; charter
issued.
- May 31 – co-op steering committee/
board sends letter to turkey
growers requesting growers contribute
15 cents per-square-foot of
housing. Within two weeks, more
than 90 growers had contributed
$994,000 for the feasibility effort.
- June — Pilgrim’s Pride stops placing
poults (young turkeys) with members.
- June — Southern States Cooperative
Foundation becomes involved in
helping the new cooperative on legal
and feasibility issues, agreeing to
develop an integrated financial
model to capture and test assumptions.
- June — board begins purchasing
eggs to place poults in growers’
poultry houses.
- June - Pilgrim’s Pride announces
plans to sell its hatchery, but not to
the co-op. This creates additional
issues, because 20 percent of the
growers are breeder-producers, who
would have to switch to grow-out
operations.
- June 26 — co-op holds second grower
meeting.
- July 12 — co-op converts to a stock
corporation, enabling it to raise capital
through the issuance of preferred
and common stock.
- July 14 — co-op holds third grower
meeting and announces that it has
signed a non-binding letter of intent
with Pilgrim’s to purchase the
Hinton plant, the Broadway, Va.,
feed mill and inventory of supplies
and birds on or before Aug. 31,
2004.
- July 16 — co-op files an application
with the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) for recognition as a tax-exempt
cooperative under Section 521 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
- July 22 — IRS approves the 521
application, meaning that the co-op
can have members in both Virginia
and West Virginia, without the
expensive and time-consuming
process of SEC registration.
- July — co-op finalizes agreement
with a national premium deli meat
processing company on products to
be produced; the company also
agrees to invest in the plant.
- July — co-op meets with CoBank
and other Farm Credit System
lenders to secure financing.
- August — negotiations with Pilgrim’s
Pride continue.
- September 15 — co-op signs purchase
agreement with Pilgrim’s Pride.
- September-October — co-op begins
to hire management staff and
announces plans to begin processing
of turkeys after Thanksgiving.
- October — co-op begins interviewing
and taking applications for processing
staff.
- October 13 — co-op receives $8 million
loan under USDA Rural
Development’s Rural Economic
Development Grant (REDLG) program
(through Shenandoah Valley
Electric Co-op).
- November 28 — co-op begins processing
members’ turkeys.
Thus, in just six months, did VPGC
go from having an idea to implementing
that idea.
Today, the co-op has 136 members
in a 10-county area of Virginia and
West Virginia. It owns a multi-milliondollar
turkey processing plant, a feed
mill and associated equipment to pick
up turkeys from members’ farms. Its
members currently have plans to grow
more than 6 million turkeys annually.
It has significant, sustainable contracts
with customers throughout the eastern
United States.
Factors for successful
co-op development
But the question remains, why has
this group of producers been able to
advance its co-op far more rapidly than
so many others?
When the Southern States
Cooperative Foundation conducts an
initial evaluation with a new group of
producers — as it did with these poultry
growers — it shares with them the
keys to success that any business project
must have. These include:
- a good idea;
- a clear vision;
- committed leadership;
- producer support (putting their dollars
at risk);
- government support (local, state,
federal);
- access to commercial credit;
- focused planning and analysis;
- good communication with members;
- perseverance.
Here’s the Foundation’s perspective
on how well Virginia Poultry Growers
Cooperative met these criteria:
- VPGC had a good idea — though
execution was a challenge, especially
due to the time constraints;
- Members absolutely had a clear
vision and could articulate it with
passion;
- Leadership was absolutely committed
to the co-op, even to the extent
that their farms and families took a
back seat for at least six days a week
for virtually the entire six months.
$250,000 to growers on its side of
the state border to invest in the
cooperative. Support from the
USDA Rural Development was critical
to the project’s success. It provided
assistance on two levels. First, it
provided significant financial assistance
in the form of the $8 million
REDLG and a still-pending $5 million
Business & Industry loan guarantee.
The other level of help was in
technical assistance from Rural
Development’s Cooperative Services
office, which helped with organizational
outstanding
cooperation in the development
of the financial feasibility
analysis and modeling. SSCF’s legal
counsel worked closely with the coop’s
local counsel.
- At every step of the process, good
communication with growers and
perseverance of the steering committee
and the board kept this cooperative
focused and on-plan.
Grower contracts
reflect member input
Another element leading to the
cooperative’s success was the foresight
of the steering committee to involve
growers in the design of grower contracts.
This created trust and cooperation,
and removed any hint of “us vs.
them,” which so often occurs in the
poultry industry between integrators
and contract growers.
The board also made a commitment
to hire quality, professional management
to oversee operations. Early on,
the board identified a well-qualified
manager for the cooperative, a seasoned
veteran in the processing industry,
skilled marketers, and food safety
staff to train processing staff and monitor
and test product quality.
Is the future success of the cooperative
assured? Of course not, but it
has a strong game plan for success.
Are there bumps in the road ahead?
Absolutely. No business has ever gone
through start-up without encountering
the “hidden bummer factor.”
That this development project succeeded
in a co-op launch can clearly
be attributed to a number of important
factors, mainly: unwavering dedication
and the hard work of the coop
leaders and members; the cooperation
and coordination of many producers
and professionals and a dose
of luck.
VPGC can stand as a model for
producers on how to create “co-op
development fever,” and for professional
development practitioners, private
businesses and government economic-
development staff on how to
coordinate and work together to make
a cooperative vision a reality.