North west Passage
Co-ops could be trail-blazers for emerging
bioenergy industries in Pacific Northwest
By Eric Bowman
Co-op Development Specialist
Northwest Cooperative Development Center
eric@nwcdc.coop
Editor’s note: The Northwest Cooperative Development Center
(NWCDC) received funding from the Bullitt Foundation and
USDA Rural Development to explore the role of the cooperative
business model in emerging bioenergy industries. The Center
produced a study, Harvesting Northwest Bioenergy
Cooperatives; Mapping the Route to a Cooperatively-Owned
Future for Emerging Bioenergy Industries available on the web
(www.nwcdc.coop/Resources/HarvestingNWBioECoops.pdf), upon
which this article is based. It examines the past, present and future
role of cooperatively owned businesses in the budding bioenergy
industry. The conclusions are based on one year of research,
including interviews with existing co-ops, surveys of groups seeking
to form co-ops and a review of case studies and articles.
ioenergy presents the Pacific Northwest with
tremendous opportunities for cleaner energy
and economic development. It’s touted as
being the answer to a variety of regional
problems ranging from rural out-migration
to diminishing natural resources.
The Northwest is a region born through resource
extraction and now defined by a “post-industrial” economy.
The traditional economy of resource-based industries and
manufacturing are transitioning into a “new” economy of
high-value-added sectors, such as software and biotech.
This economic transition has created new winners, but
also new losers. For example, Microsoft has created many
new millionaires while population and median incomes are
rapidly decreasing in many rural towns.
The rise of a renewable energy industry has created hope
and promise that a rural renaissance is on the horizon.
Renewable energy resources, such as wind and biomass, are
distributed throughout rural regions and hold the potential
for widely distributed economic benefits. Rural economies
are realizing new potential from pre-existing assets. (The
term “bioenergy” in this article refers to renewable energy
made from biological sources, including liquid “biofuels”
(primarily ethanol and biodiesel) and “biopower,” derived
from numerous biomass sources, such as anaerobic digestion
generation.)
The opportunity for economic development should not
only be viewed within the context of jobs
creation and commodity prices, but also
the long-term future of potential
ownership and equity. Different ownership
models are ultimately designed to benefit
their stakeholders, i.e., the owners. Local
ownership substantially increases
economic benefits compared to absentee,
investor-owned businesses.
While the Midwest has offered a
dynamic example for how to build locally
owned biofuels plants, the situation in the
Pacific Northwest is much different.
Unlike the Midwest, the Northwest
doesn’t have as long of a cultural tradition
of farmer co-ops. The Northwest has a
more diverse ecology and geography and,
subsequently, a broader range of crops.
Whereas the agricultural infrastructure of
the Midwest is based on a surplus of highvolume/
low-value commodities, the
Northwest is based on specialty crops (such as apples, wine,
etc.) and geared for export. According to data from USDA
Census of Agriculture, the produce value per acre in Idaho,
Washington and Oregon are four times that of Iowa.
The specific industries perceived as holding the greatest
potential for bioenergy development in the Pacific Northwest
are:
- Biodiesel
- Ethanol
- Anaerobic digestion
- Combustion of woody biomass
North west's considerable potential
The Northwest holds near-term potential for a regionally
based liquid biofuel/biodiesel industry. Oregon, Washington
and Idaho have the potential to grow substantial oilseed
crops, primarily rotational canola.
Multiple farmer-owned projects are now underway but a
great deal of infrastructure capacity has yet to be developed.
Currently, there are few regional crushers to separate the
meal and the oil, and more hybrid research is needed to
guarantee producers reliable crop yields. Just as with ethanol,
oilseed producers (for example, the Pendleton Grain
Growers) can engage in a variety of capacities to capture
greater value for their agricultural products.
The Midwest ethanol industry provides a timely case study
of how a liquid biofuels industry can be developed from the
farm up. Nationally, the ethanol industry is experiencing a
rapid transformation toward larger, investor-owned facilities.
Virtually all current ethanol industry development in the
Pacific Northwest is investor-owned.
The Northwest’s primary comparative advantages for
ethanol production are low-cost commodities already flowing
through the region, via rail and barges, to Pacific Rim
markets. It also has a large, pre-existing feed-mash market to
supply the region’s dairies.
While corn and wheat are grown in the Pacific Northwest,
the most abundant biomass feedstocks are forestry and
agricultural residues. That said, the future of cellulosic
feedstocks for ethanol is still unclear. Research and
development and the refining of technologies are needed to
fully commercialize a cellulosic ethanol industry.
Assuming the production technology will be
commercialized, the long-term potential for cellulosic
ethanol is enormous and could play a major role in the liquid
biofuels industry. Just as an investor-owned firm (such as
Iogen with Goldman Sachs and Royal Dutch/Shell) can
explore launching a cellulosic ethanol re f i n e ry, so could
a group of agricultural producers explore cooperating
to:
- Jointly market their agricultural residues to a biofuel plant
(i.e., act as a bargaining and supply procurement
cooperative);
- Join in a joint venture with an investor-owned or privately
held company to operate a plant;
- Launch a producer-owned small- to medium-scale facility.
AD power suited to co-ops
Anaerobic digestion (or “AD”) promises a niche solution
to a distinct set of problems, from energy production to
manure management. A well-recognized industry in other
parts of the world, AD is quickly becoming more feasible in
the Pacific Northwest because of technical advancements for
its cooler climate. A group of farmers in a local area with
large quantities of animal waste could realize economic
opportunities by forming an AD bioenergy cooperative.
Cooperative ownership is well-suited to address specific
project needs, such as the initial high capital costs of digester
construction and the need for large quantities of manure. As
an industry, AD offers promising opportunities to form
synergies between multiple stakeholder groups, i.e., farmers
who need improved manure management and communities
that want clean waterways.
Woody biomass
The combustion of woody biomass for heat and power is
an established industry led by wood products manufacturers.
Innovation promises that new technologies, such as
integrated biorefineries, are likely just around the corner.
Because bioenergy production uses large amounts of
feedstock, a co-op of like-producing individuals (such as
straw-producing seed growers) could efficiently support such
a facility. Because of the sheer quantity of available resources,
woody biomass promises to play an increasing role in the
nation’s renewable energy portfolio.
America now has an opportunity to establish the future
direction of the bioenergy industry and what it will
accomplish for the nation. There will be costs and benefits,
no matter the direction. If we seek a bioenergy economy that
delivers on its promises to rural America, then we must
incorporate rural economic development priorities.
While every state in the Pacific Northwest is seeking to
accelerate the development of nascent bioenergy industries,
there is still much development to occur in order to have the
vibrant, regionally based industry people envision.
Recommendations for new and existing co-ops:
- Normal rules of business apply to co-ops: create a marketdriven
enterprise with a well-researched and thought-out
business plan, have adequate reserve funds, etc.
- Build partnerships — co-ops represent a broader
community than an average limited liability corporation
(LLC) and, by definition, must appreciate and incorporate
community interests. This is strength for co-ops.
- Identify what differentiates the group, be it feedstock
production or marketing, and leverage these strengths to
ensure economic success.
Co-ops must clearly identify and research their markets,
resources and partners to determine if the project justifies the
possible risks.
Key recommendations for local government,
policymakers and the general public:
- Provide guaranteed markets through contracts, such as the
business relationship the City of Portland is exploring with
Pendleton Grain Growers and Madison Farms to
potentially supply Oregon-grown biodiesel.
- Encourage and support accessible and sizable capitalization,
including investment equity, grants and debt availability
that provides “gap” financing and loan guarantees.
- Educate about, and advocate for, the benefits of local
ownership.
- Realize the broader condition of industry development and
seek to create what is wanted, be it decentralized, locallyowned
or centralized, absentee-owned business.
- Create ownership-based incentives and/or tax benefits, such
as Minnesota’s disincentives for selling off a farmer-owned
facility.
Time to build equity is now
While we may still be at the dawn of the renewable energy
industry, it is important for co-ops to build equity now. As
private capital has rushed into renewable energy, the
resources are becoming increasingly under contract with
well-capitalized and entrenched firms.
As Under Secretary for Rural Development Thomas Dorr
has pointed out, “This is probably the greatest new
opportunity for wealth creation in rural America in our
lifetimes…” It is no secret wealth is generated through the
accumulation and leveraging of assets, not through passively
providing inputs.
In the Pacific Northwest, a “gold-rush mentality” has led
to a rapid acquisition of the “low hanging fruit” of renewable
energy resources. For example, look at the wind industry,
where much of the easily accessible wind rights have
consolidated into the possession of just several firms. While
there are still niche holes well-suited to communities, family
farmers and co-ops, the major players are in place.
There would be enormous environmental benefits if all
the manure in the Northwest flowed into investor-owned
digesters of the design-build-own-operate model. Unfortunately though in that scenario, the priority of local,rural economic benefit risks being decoupled from the other
aims of the renewable energy projects.
Investors will play a powerful role in the rapid
development of these industries, yet it is important for local
players, co-ops and communities to develop and maintain
equity early while opportunities are still available before these
industries mature (see sidebar, above). These industries will
undoubtedly expand and contract, as ethanol has
demonstrated. Farmers, co-ops and communities will need to
be strategic in their risk exposure.
Marketable advantages of the
co-op business model
- Democratically controlled by those it serves; surplus is distributed equitably.
- Ties to local community mean co-ops are more likely to be socially
conscientious, more accountable and more representative of the broader
community.
- No investors to feed, so more income stays in the community.
- Permanence: co-ops live beyond their founders.
- Self-management, as co-ops are a self-help tool for people to achieve
together what they cannot achieve alone.
- Trusted business partners — most people believe producers to be honest and
reliable individuals.
- Co-ops focus on social, individual and community needs in addition to the
bottom line. Most investor-owned firms focus only on the bottom line.
Industrial lifecycle stages
Usually caused by product innovation or deregulation, the
following lifecycle stages are common in emerging
industries:
- Dormant: low numbers of competitors enjoy high monopoly
profits.
- Takeoff: soaring entry and virtually non-existent exit from
the market.
- High Turnover: many firms enter and leave the market.
- Shake-out: mass exit via mergers, bankruptcies, etc.
- Stabilization: a stable oligopoly emerges.
(Source: Michael Gort, Steven Klepper. Time paths in the
diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal, vol. 92,
No. 367. September, 1982).