Battening down the hatches

Co-op security measures intensified in post-September 11 world


John Dewey, CF Industries Inc.
Sarah Schmidt, Farmland Industries Inc.
Gail Thuner, USDA Rural Business-Cooperative Service


Editor’s Note: Dewey is corporate communications manager for
CF Industries, Schmidt is public relations manager for Farmland
Industries and Thuner is a USDA agricultural economist.


he events of Sept. 11, 2001, have forever changed the American mind set. No longer do Americans feel safe from attacks by terrorists. Feelings of shock, anguish and anger combined with a real sense of violation have led to increased security measures throughout the United States in nearly every industry.

The agricultural industry has been especially affected as concerns about the use of crop dusters and agricultural chemicals have risen to a new high. Two major cooperatives in the fertilizer industry, Farmland and CF Industries,have always been aware of potential security concerns, but both have increased their guard as security threats have become a heightened concern in a post-Sept. 11 world.

Farmland redoubles security efforts
Assessing risk, planning “what-if” scenarios and protecting products from illegal use have long been routine practices for Farmland Industries. But the September 11 events, as well as the anthrax-tainted mail incidents, have generated an added security emphasis.

Before Sept. 11, Farmland’s “what-if” scenarios may have dealt with a leak or accidental release of fuel or an agrichemical. Now Farmland considers the threat of anthraxtainted mail or even someone flying an airplane into a fertilizer manufacturing facility to create an explosion.

Preparation will make or break the response to such an event. Scott Ast, Farmland director of worldwide security,and his team look at big-picture processes and risks. They also serve as a resource and consultant to Farmland business units and facilities. “We want to protect all the points in the process from securing raw materials to production, storage and distribution,” Ast says.

Although imagining the most elaborate “what-if” scenarios is part of the job, it is important to balance that with the most likely security breaches. According to Ast, the most prevalent illegal use of a Farmland product remains the theft of anhydrous ammonia to make methamphetamine.

Transportation is another vulnerable point in the production and distribution process. Companies such as Farmland are taking necessary precautions against theft and misuse. Farmland drivers are more aware of their surroundings and are encouraged to lock their units and park in secure areas. Farmland has also eliminated preloading of trucks.

Farmland security officials have attended a number of meetings between farm organizations and government agencies to discuss the chances of agriculture becoming a terrorism target. It recommends the following suggestions for local cooperatives.
Awareness, vigilance and common sense are all part of
ensuring that ag products are used in the intended manner.

CF Industries stresses around-the-clock security
At CF Industries, new security enhancements were added to complement the company’s existing list of security systems and activities after Sept. 11. Frank Buzzanca, vice president of Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) and Engineering,is the company’s top security officer. “We recognize a need for heightened awareness following Sept. 11,” Buzzanca said. “We’ve always had a strong commitment to safety and security.

Now our focus must be stronger.”
The following list of safety and security precautions were in place at CF prior to September 11: CF’s corporate Web site has taken on a different look following Sept. 11 as well. Anything CF felt was too revealing from a security standpoint was taken off of its Internet site.

Employee training remains a vital component of CF’s security program. CF Industries’ media relations training was tested during a television reporter’s surprise visit to the company’s Louisiana plant. The reporter was following up on a news lead regarding reports of a suspicious vehicle in the area. While the reporter gathered information from the plant manager,the television photographer stood near a service road and prepared to set up a camera to videotape the plant. CF security guards promptly asked the photographer for identification. The reporter later noted on the newscast that the company was doing a good job maintaining its security.

“A strong safety culture has existed at CF for a long time,” said Buzzanca. “This employee mind set is deeply rooted as a result of years of training, drills, safety audits and learning from experience,” Buzzanca said. “Our employees are trained to be alert at all times.”

CF also communicates periodically with residents in the communities where it operates. Information about shelter-in-place is circulated in an effort to educate people on the steps to take if a major incident were to occur.

The company’s public affairs office has monitored anti-terrorism initiatives discussed in Washington and at state capitols. CF will work with trade associations and regulatory agencies to ensure the safety of the fertilizer industry’s infrastructure and products. The company will continue to enhance security as required to protect employees, company assets and surrounding communities.

In spite of all the new measures,though, awareness of potential threats and continued communication with the industry, the government, the community, and employees remain at the core of these cooperatives’ new security programs.












May/June Table of Contents