A Place at the Table
NFU delegates carry family farmer
concerns to Capitol Hill, White House
By Dan Campbell, Editor
USDA Rural Development
tanding at the speakers’
podium of the National
Farmers Union (NFU)
annual meeting in
Washington, D.C., in
March, Wes Niederman was helping to
herd a blizzard of NFU policy positions
toward resolution. It was a day-long
example of democracy in action as 600
members (142 of them voting
delegates) from around the nation
discussed and debated issues that
eventually filled 200 pages of policy
positions — many of them issues that
could have a major impact on the
continued viability of family farming.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch
(literally) in North Dakota, it was
calving time, and Niederman’s family
was dealing with a very different kind
of blizzard — one that roared down
from Canada, dumping 7 inches of
snow and driving the mercury to 20
below zero. Luckily, Niederman’s
daughter, Myra, and a friend were
home for a visit and helped his son
Matthew (a recent college graduate)
ease all those new-born snouts into the
cold world of a North Dakota winter.
As much as Niederman needed to be
home to help with calving, he says his
work in Washington was just as critical
to the future of the family’s wheat and
cattle farm. He and the other NFU
delegates passed positions dealing with
everything from renewable energy and
commodity check-off programs to rural
healthcare and conservation.
Delegates to the NFU convention
also heard from — and got to question
— a who’s who of Congressional and
Executive Branch leaders, including:
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack,
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi,
House Ag Committee Chairman Collin
Peterson, Senate Ag Committee
Chairman Tom Harkin and ranking
minority member Charles Grassley, and
Rep. Rosa DeLauro, who chairs the
Agriculture Appropriations
Subcommittee
“There are always some in
Washington trying to strip money away
from farm programs, so a big part of
our effort this year is to make sure the
[2008] Farm Bill is implemented as
passed,” says Niederman.
On any day of the year, farmers and
ranchers like Niederman sacrifice
precious work time away from their
farms in order to attend all manner of
ag meetings — ranging from meetings
of their local co-op boards, to farm
commodity councils and state and
national farmers’ associations, such as
NFU. They do so, in part, because they
know that what happens at the point of
a pen in Washington and in their state
capitals can do so much to help or
hinder the work that they do from the
seat of a tractor or in their milking
parlors.
Staying off the menu
If there was ever a year when it was
opportune to hold the NFU annual
meeting in Washington, this was it.
With the nation in the grips of the
worst economic recession since the
1930s, family farmers must intensify
efforts to ensure that their voices are
heard in the halls of Congress, says
newly elected NFU President Roger
Johnson.
“In Washington, if you don’t have a
place at the table, you will have a place
on the menu,” says Johnson, who is
taking the reins at NFU after 12 years
as North Dakota agriculture
commissioner. He succeeds Tom Buis,
who is now working at Growth Energy
which promotes biofuels.
Working on Capitol Hill is nothing
new for Johnson, who still owns the
farm his grandfather started 100 years
ago and on which he grew up. As
former president of the National
Association of State Departments of
Agriculture, he is well versed in the
realities of the legislative process, and
he has also devoted much effort to
helping consumers better understand
where their food comes from and what
it takes to produce it.
The NFU meeting included time for
delegates to form teams that visited
congressional leaders from their various
states to discuss vital farm issues;
Johnson and the NFU board of
directors did the same with White
House officials.
Key to the NFU lobbying blitz was
to take those 200 pages of policy
positions and boil them down to a page
or two of the most pressing issues. High
on that list is NFU’s support for a
national energy policy calling for 25
percent of the nation’s power to be
generated from renewable resources by
the year 2025. This translates into
support for biofuel and wind power, as
well as efforts that promote local
ownership of renewable energy in order
to keep more of those energy dollars
home in rural America.
Another top issue for NFU is
support for improved rural healthcare,
which Johnson says is essential if rural
communities are to
hang on to their
population and
attract new
residents. NFU is
also advocating for a
mandatory “capand-
trade” system
for carbon credits.
The latter position
puts NFU at odds
with some other
major farm groups.
But Johnson is
convinced NFU is
taking the right path.
“Climate change legislation will
almost certainly result in farmers having
to pay more for energy and fertilizer,”
Johnson says. He thinks these higher
prices can be offset — and hopefully
even become a net gain for farmers — if
producers are rewarded with carbon
credits for adopting environmentally
friendly farming practices, such as notill
farming, re-establishing permanent
vegetation and adopting advanced
grazing techniques.
“This [environmental legislation] is
huge, and agriculture must have a place
at the table,” Johnson says. The key to
earning carbon credits, which farmers
could then sell on the carbon-trading
market, is to show that farming
practices are sufficiently different from
standard practices and that there is
science showing that these practices
result in carbon sequestration.
Farmers aren’t the only ones who
can benefit from such policies. Johnson
notes that city leaders in Fargo, N.D.,
are earning revenue by drilling holes at
landfills where methane gas (generated
from decomposing trash) is compressed
and stored, then sold to a foodprocessing
plant, which burns the gas
for heat. Pound for pound, methane gas
is considered to be a far bigger culprit
of global warming than carbon, which is
one reason interest is growing among
dairy farmers in processing methane gas
from manure.
Dairy farmers struggling
“I keep reading that rural America
hasn’t really been hurt by the economic
downturn,” says Niederman. “But that
just isn’t true. When the economy went
south, our commodity markets went
down with them.” And when that
happens, virtually all of rural America
feels the pain to some extent, he notes.
No one knows that better this year
than dairy farmers like Joaquin
Contente, a delegate from Hanford,
Calif., where he runs a 700-cow dairy
farm with his brother. The Contente
family has seen its milk check about cut
in half during the past year.
“These milk prices are the worst
event of my life,” says Contente, who in
March was losing about $75,000 per
month on his operation. He has been
averaging just $9 per hundredweight of
milk sold, down from nearly $20 a year
ago; he needs $15 just to cover costs. At
the same time milk prices were plummeting,
he has had to pay record-high
prices for the corn fed to his herd while
also contending with soaring fuel bills.
While he hasn’t yet seen many farm
failures in his area, “many farmers are
hovering on the brink,” Contente says.
“Younger farmers who are just building
their herds and don’t have much equity
built up in their farms are especially
vulnerable. Many are on the edge.”
What really bothers Contente is that
grocery store prices for milk have not
shown a similar drop in price to what
farmers are experiencing. He thinks a
big part of the blame is concentration
in the food industry, resulting in everfewer
food companies that control more
and more of the retail market.
“We have about four huge food
companies that end up touching almost
all of our milk in one way or another
before it reaches the consumer,” he
says. “That’s a big part of the problem
facing us: the lack of a functioning,
truly competitive marketplace due to
concentration.”
Contente says he thinks some
national farmer associations have
become too closely tied to big food
companies, and have lost their focus on
the farmers they are supposed to be
helping. NFU, on the other hand, “is a
true, bottom-up farm organization that
has only one purpose: to support the
causes of family farmers,” he says.
Organic growers
succeed with CSA
Wisconsin member Katrina Becker
represents a growing segment of NFU:
young organic vegetable and fruit
farmers. She and her husband, Tony
Schultz, grow 170 different crops on
120 acres on their Stoney Acres Farm
near Athens, Wis. — everything from
broccoli to raspberries, Jerusalem
artichokes and sour cherries. The
family also raises grass-fed beef.
They started a Community
Supported Agriculture (CSA) project
three years ago, and this year added a
neighboring farmer who provides eggs.
So far, the CSA has far exceeded
expectations. It started with 72
members the first year, but in just three
years has grown to 145 families in
nearby communities.
Members pay either $460 or $300
for 20 weekly produce deliveries, the
amount depending on their share size.
The deliveries begin the first week in
June and last until mid-October — with
an optional final delivery around
Thanksgiving. Members include a
community hospital that enrolled in the
CSA on behalf of its employees. “We’ve
got all the members we can supply right
now,” Becker says.
Her goal is to expand the CSA by
forming a small co-op with several
other farmers — maybe even bringing
in some beginning farmers interested in
buying land near her farm, where she
says farmland is still relatively
affordable. Becker would also like to
start a processing kitchen where farmers
could further process food — producing
everything from dairy foods to wine and
beer. She also thinks the area has great
agri-tourism potential.
Becker and Schultz are the type of
business-savvy young farmers that NFU
is looking to as the future of family
farming. As such, they have been picked
as an NFU Enterprise Couple, a
program under which NFU provides
members with training opportunities to
further enhance their abilities as future
leaders.
“We were attracted to NFU because
of its progressive, pro-family farmer
policies, its democratic functioning and
the fact that it is very influential in
Wisconsin,” Becker says.
A highlight of the trip for her was
the time on Capitol Hill visiting the
Wisconsin Congressional delegation.
“We talked about many issues, such as
the need for dairy price supports,
concerns about market concentration,
our support for conservation programs
and the need for more programs that
help small farms.”
Growers of vegetable, fruit and other
specialty crops qualify for few, if any,
federal support programs, she notes.
One way to help them is to offer more
benefits for those who use conservation
practices in their farming.
Despite the success of her family
farm, Becker says she is very concerned
about the small dairy farmers all around
her farm. They have suffered severely
with the drop in milk prices. She, too,
views concentration in the food
industry as one of the major problems
facing farmers. Becker questions why
“anti-monopoly laws are so toothless, or
are not being enforced.”
NFU President Johnson agrees,
saying concentration in the food
industry has long been a top concern
for NFU. “We’ve pushed the
Department of Justice to disallow the
mergers that have resulted in these
huge food conglomerates, but without a
lot of success. As we’ve seen with the
banking industry during the current
financial crisis, no company should ever
be allowed to become ‘too big to fail.’
We’re all having to pay for the
consequences of that now.”
Of course, one of the most effective
tools that can help farmers counteract
concentration in the marketplace is
through the use of cooperatives.
Johnston points out that the roots of
NFU are in the cooperative movement,
and that the organization has always
shown strong support for cooperatives.
“Cooperatives play a big part in
NFU. In North Dakota and much of
the Midwest, cooperatives formed the
foundation that agriculture was founded
and built upon,” Johnson says.
Kick-starting the rural economy
with renewable energy
With 200 pages of policy positions adopted during the
National Farmers Union annual meeting, most issues
important to farmers and rural communities are addressed in
one way or another. At the top of the list for many of the
delegates is the policy they adopted in support of renewable
energy, the concluding portion of which is excerpted below.
(The full text of all the policies is online at:
http://nfu.org/about/policy).
“BE IT RESOLVED, National Farmers Union supports the
following policies that demonstrate a commitment to
expanding renewable energy and creating additional
financial opportunities through ecosystems services and
markets:
- Federal incentives for local ownership in renewable energy
production to ensure economic benefits stay in local
communities;
- Expansion of the ethanol blend wall above the current 10
percent;
- Cultivation of the renewable electricity marketplace through
enactment of a federal Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)
to require a measureable percentage of the market to be
supplied by new, renewable energy;
- Support for Landowner Wind Associations (LWA), to
facilitate existing and emerging LWA’s in assessing and
marketing wind resources to project developers.
- Full funding for research and development of renewable
energy technologies, including efforts to address
infrastructure requirements; and
- A permanent expansion of renewable energy production tax
credits, including those for wind and solar production,
including an option to take grant funding in lieu of tax
credits.
THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, in supporting
a national, mandatory carbon emission cap-and-trade system
to reduce non-farm greenhouse gas emissions, NFU outlines
the following priorities for pending climate change legislation:
- Providing USDA with authority to implement agricultural
offset programs;
- Eliminating an artificial cap on the use of domestic offset
allowances;
- Ensuring legislation does not unfairly undermine the full
value of agricultural offset activities;
- Empowering USDA to develop effective scientific modeling
tools to measure carbon sequestration on farms;
- Recognizing early actors who have already undertaken
greenhouse gas emission reduction activities; and
- Allowing producers to stack credits and ensure that
projects in greenhouse gas offset markets are not excluded
from also participating in other environmental service
markets.”