Skip navigation barsU S D A and Rural Development Logos            Committed to the future of rural communities    

Rural Development
FY 2000 and FY 2001 Annual Performance Plans

Business Programs  |  Cooperative Development Programs  |  Homeownership Programs  |  Rental Housing Programs  |  Community Facilities Programs  |  Water and Waste Program  |  Telecommunications Program  |  Electric Program  |  Management Initiatives  |  Resource Summaries

PERFORMANCE GOALS AND
INDICATORS

FY 1998
ACTUAL

FY 1999
ACTUAL

FY 2000
TARGET

FY 2001
TARGET

Provide modern, affordable electric
service to rural residents and
communities.

 

Jobs created as a result of facilities
constructed with electric funds

21,275

36,018

48,600

35,600

Number of rural electric systems
upgraded

160

179

200

180

Number of consumers benefitting
from system improvements (in millions)

2.7

2.8

3.1

2.8

Direct program resources to those rural
communities with the greatest need.

 

Electric loans (number and amount)
to clients serving persistent poverty
counties (RUS-financed electric
systems provide service in 523 of
the 540 identified persistent poverty
counties) (Dollars in millions)

74
$539

72
$538

84
$889

83
$715

Electric loans (number and amount)
to clients serving persistent out-
migration counties (RUS-financed
electric systems provide service to
655 of the 700 counties identified as
having net out-migration) (Dollars in millions)

72
$286

83
$379

84
$889

88
$758

Maximize the leveraging of loan funds to
increase the number of rural residents
assisted.

 

Leveraging of rural electric financial
assistance (private investment to
RUS funding)

$2.60: 1

$2.70: 1

$2.73: 1

$2.87: 1

Discussion of Performance Goals: The availability of an adequate supply of electricity is critical to achieving the Departmental goal to “Expand economic and trade opportunities for agricultural producers and other rural residents.”

The electric industry is rapidly moving toward a new era of deregulation and intense competition. As more states move toward deregulation, opening up the electric infrastructure to retailing and driving the forces of competition, the rural consumer and the rural provider faces particular challenges. For example, RUS electric borrowers average only 6 consumers per mile compared to 35 consumers per mile for investor-owned electric utility systems. As the competitive nature of the industry heightens, it will be extremely important to rural electric consumers that rural electric providers have access to reasonably priced capital. The electric program fulfills the continuing purpose of ensuring that rural residents continue to be served with reliable and affordable electricity.

The performance goals for the electric program fall into three major categories. One set of goals reflects the impact of RUS on rural residents by measuring the number of rural individuals, families, businesses, and communities whose quality of life has been enhanced with improved electric and telecommunications services, distance learning and telemedicine programs, and improved access to clean water and waste water disposal. Since most of the loans are for construction purposes, a second set measures the impact of the projects on the community through the creation of jobs. The third category of goals reflect the agency’s success in implementing two key themes of the Rural Development mission area strategic plan, directing resources to the neediest communities and leveraging of financial resources.

Top


<< Page 28  |  Page 30 >>